Leadership, especially the participative leadership is one of the most important aspects of professional life. If a group or team is lead by an effective and good leader, it is more or likely that the team will be able to fulfill their as well as the organizations goal and objectives successfully. However, if the leader just commands or orders the team for specific tasks, then it is probable that the team is demotivated and they will perform less than others with a better leader.
Participative leadership also known as Democratic Leadership Style is a method of leadership that involves all team members in terms of identifying important goals as well as developing strategies and procedures to achieve the goals. From this point of view, participative style of leadership can be perceived as a leadership style that rely primarily on functioning as facilitator that the one who simply issues commands or orders or making assignment for each member of the team. This kind of leadership style could be utilized in volunteer setting, business setting and even in home.
One of the primary advantage of participative or Democratic Leadership is that its allows to have another possible leaders that can boom within the organization in due time. Many leaders prefer this style because it involves an active participation of every team members, which makes them to demonstrate their creativity, abilities and talents. This makes a team to discover hidden assets that can eventually help the team or organization grow. Thus it also helps every member to have an opportunity for them to exert their skills, so that they can also share their abilities in the team.
Participative leaders also increases the range of possibilities for a certain team. When leadership styles that significantly leave the entire decision making and direction in one person, it is somewhat difficult to see in a particular angle. So if the leadership management encourage other member to be involved in the process of decision making, a given course of action can be seen or approach in different perceptions. It can also point out the strength and weaknesses to certain approach and can be resolved by the team working hand in hand to come out with the best decision for a certain company.
Moreover, on the downside of participated leadership is the aspect of time. This style of leadership does usually engage the requirement of time before a certain action is taken. On the other hand this is just the natural side of the participative style of leadership, which allows every team member to have an input. In addition, the extra time required for this process is usually leads to a decision that eventually benefit every team member. This is ideally best means for your team or organization to be effective.
Finally, successful participative leaders permits the skills and talents of every member of the team to be employed in arriving to the best decision, which is beneficial. Even though the team leader is typically responsible for making the best final decision, which shares the function within the team, sharing ideas, opinions, skills and talent is still effective for the whole team to be efficient and successful.
Leaders are constantly seeking to exchange their knowledge, because that's how we increase our leadership skills.
Click below to see contributions from other leaders to this page...
Jody Not rated yet
As a young Sergeant in the early 80's and without the vocabulary to talk about it, I knew the value of participative leadership. I instructed my team members …
True But Not rated yet
It is also correct to say these leadership styles depend much on the type of organization and what it does as its business. One would want to imagine how …
Return from Participative Leadership to Leadership Styles
Return from Participative Leadership to Leadership-Central home page
Stay Informed!!
Get our Newsletter.
New! Comments
Have your say about what you just read! Leave me a comment in the box below.